Solarwinds, Fluke Networks, Zabbix and Nagios are just a few of the network monitoring solutions that IT Central Station can tell you about.
There are literally dozens of enterprise network monitoring
solutions in the market, and choosing the right solution for your needs can be
confusing. Which tool is right for you and your needs? You can choose
from toolsets from large commercial players such as Solarwinds, Fluke Networks
and OPNET or look to open source solutions such as Zabbix and Nagios. How do
you decide?
IT Central Station is like Yelp or TripAdvisor for IT software,
but unlike other review sites, all of our reviewers are strictly validated to
ensure that each review is authentic and based on a real user's experience. We
are an open, vendor-neutral site, and we do not endorse one vendor or another.
If you use network monitoring solutions in your job, you can write your own
review and promote your expertise to a community of IT decision makers.
Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor (NPM): Aaron Leskiw, a network engineer at a large consulting firm, wrote
a fascinating in-depth review of Solarwinds NPM.
He writes that NPM has an excellent UI and "does an all-round great job at
automatically discovering network devices." He likes its support for
syslog, virtualization, and VSANs. On the other hand, he says that that stock
reports feel limited. He is also disappointed about the lack of Hyper-V
support, although you can poll it with SNMP.
Nagios vs Zabbix: These are two popular open source solutions for network
monitoring, and a number of our network engineers take an opinion on which one
is the superior solution. The majority of our reviewers prefer Zabbix, and the
debates get quite passionate about which solution is best. One of our reviewers
writes that "if you're fed up with Nagios or doing a brand new deployment,
taking a serious look at Zabbix will be worth your while." He says that
Zabbix offers a quick and simple install, support for multiple platforms, a
variety of templates covering most popular software, integrated graphs, and
escalation management.
IBM Tivoli Netcool: One of our users gave Netcool a four-star review. She would have
given it five stars, except for the fact that it is a highly complex product
and required significant training in order to get up to speed. Once she was
trained on the solution, she found it very useful for her needs.
ManageEngine OpManager: A real user of OpManager writes that he chose OpManager because it
is feature-rich; has strong automation features, especially for troubleshooting
and network mapping; and supports Hyper-V and URL monitoring. On the other
hand, its large feature set can also increase complexity, and he has
encountered some difficulty loading custom MIBs for obscure devices.
No comments:
Post a Comment